Mod 14 Curriculum Selection Activity 2
Mod 14 Curriculum Selection Activity 2
Text Evaluation: Harcourt Science Florida Edition, Grade 4
Publisher: Harcourt School Publishers
Publication Year: 2007
Accessed via: Google Books – Full table of contents, glossary, index, and multiple chapter previews available.
TEXT SELECTION CRITERIA REVIEW
1. Learner Needs Assessment
-
Strengths: The text is organized by unit objectives and includes guiding questions at the start of each chapter.
-
Limitations: No embedded assessments or surveys to determine ELLs’ language levels or background knowledge.
-
Comment: Teachers must provide supplemental surveys and readiness checks for ELLs at the start of each unit.
2. Visuals, Topics, and Format
-
Strengths: Text is colorful with strong use of diagrams, labeled images, and chapter previews.
-
Limitations: Images do not reflect a wide range of cultural perspectives.
Comment: Supplement with images of scientists and contexts from diverse backgrounds to improve inclusivity.
3. Authentic Language
-
The text uses academic English without scaffolds, sentence frames, or leveled versions for ELLs.
Comment: Needs sentence stems, language frames, and simplified companion texts for students at lower WIDA levels.
4. Cultural Awareness
-
Little to no reference to students’ cultural backgrounds or lived experiences.
Comment: Teachers should integrate culturally relevant examples (e.g., hurricane prep for Florida students, local wildlife).
5. Comprehensible Input and Pacing
-
Lessons are short and build on each other.
-
Not differentiated for slower-paced learners or students with interrupted education.
Comment: Implement tiered lesson plans with chunked text and peer-supported guided reading.
6. Active Participation
-
Includes some experiments and interactive notebook pages.
-
No clear protocols for structured speaking and listening.
Comment: Incorporate turn-and-talk routines, sentence starters, and structured group discussion roles.
7. Prior Knowledge Activation
-
Missing formal KWL or schema-building tools.
Comment: Add teacher-created graphic organizers or picture walks for ELLs prior to each reading.
8. Learner Progress
-
Checkpoints at the end of each lesson.
-
No tools for student self-monitoring or language progress tracking.
Comment: Add self-checklists and exit tickets aligned to both science content and language development goals.
Overall Rating:
Score: 5.5/10
Adoption Decision: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
The Harcourt Science text is strong in layout and grade-level content but lacks cultural responsiveness and language accessibility. It can be adopted if paired with structured scaffolds and ELL-specific support.
Supplemental Recommendations:
-
Differentiation & Tiering:
-
Create leveled texts (e.g., using Newsela Science) for pre-teaching core content.
-
Use partner reading and visual-based summaries for emerging ELLs.
-
-
Scaffolding Tools:
-
Integrate vocabulary foldables, sentence stems, and labeling activities.
-
Use multilingual glossaries and digital translators.
-
-
Cultural Relevance:
-
Connect each science concept to a student’s cultural or local experience (e.g., linking weather units to hurricanes in Florida).
-
-
Structured Speaking/Listening:
-
Add roles for lab partners (e.g., "materials manager," "presenter") to ensure ELLs participate.
-
Embed think-pair-share prompts and sentence starters.
-
Textbook Selection Guidelines for Inclusive Classrooms
I. Diversity-Centered Textbook Evaluation Protocol
-
Assemble a review committee of ESOL teachers, general education teachers, ESE support staff, and parent/community reps.
-
Use the Text and Non-Text Selection Criteria to score materials.
-
Prioritize textbooks that:
-
Reflect multiple cultures and perspectives.
-
Are aligned to Florida State Standards and WIDA levels.
-
Offer scaffolded support and structured routines.
-
II. Differentiation Support Requirement
-
Require publishers to include:
-
ELL adaptations (sentence frames, visual glossaries, etc.)
-
Leveled reading passages or e-book companions
-
Multilingual supplemental tools
-
III. Multicultural Content Inclusion
-
Mandate at least 25% of visual and content examples reflect:
-
Racial/ethnic diversity
-
Global perspectives
-
Local cultural relevance (e.g., regional science examples)
-
IV. Student Voice & Feedback
-
Pilot chapters with diverse student groups before full adoption.
-
Collect and review student reflections on readability and cultural relevance.
Critique of Current Practice
Currently, non-textbook selections are often made by general education teams without cross-department collaboration. They are typically driven by budget and curriculum pacing, not student linguistic or cultural needs. This often results in the use of texts that:
-
Are inaccessible to ELLs without extra teacher prep.
-
Lack diverse representation.
-
Do not offer structured opportunities for student talk or response.
Proposed Changes
-
Require all curriculum adoptions to include an ELL Accessibility Review.
-
Require pilot implementation in inclusive classrooms with feedback surveys.
-
Provide training for teachers on using adopted texts with ELL scaffolds.